_By Mantara_ I kept holding my childish vision as fun fun fun for years... about 6 and 9. Then Miroku era came up in a reading blog of Ise_Hakusan Dou
伊勢ー白山 道 >>> blog.goo.ne.jp/isehakusandou >>> Ise-HakuSun-Do ・ Secret Essence of the Samurai Spirit ・
My vision with Fantasy+Imagination started dancing so gracefully also Feeling got lively ever. If you don`t mind, read on.
By my vision :
369=Miroku has a deeply fun and primitively simple pure meaning for me.
Its meaning could be not including judgemental thought and mind. Also it is noticing it ; 369 is not accepting to lay down on a couch with only Good or Bad potato chips. Easy to bite, but don`t take it anymore to eat as many did in a past then had killing each other so, just pic up then observe it. Understand it. Give your feeling to it,if you want to do. And 666 very possibly be our good partner and best friends.
Yet a mystery in my head, sure,my head and brain is my mystic divine universe and for having propel, I would concern about what and where is my jurisdiction for my universe and my body. Fortunately after I knew Ise-Hakusan Dou, I learned about it.......There is everything and nothing to be mine for my micro universe as my body. A body have to stay on Earth. Sure,my soul and conscious is my self to goes back to Origin Root Kami. Also a soul can be like a golden rounded ball of my dream. Oh yes, other golden balls are at......, However I move on.
A one divine reason is this : A mankind body is borrowing from Kami of Earth. Earth is body Planet with Spirit. Just like us. Sure,our body is micro earth.We have a ocean as water in our body is clearly truth.
369 for me :
*3 is three divine in us.1_A self conscious. 2_A self justice.3_ A Regard, a feeling, consideration, sympathy,understanding and kindness and so on.
*6 is a realistic skill to protect all 3 in me. So 6 is like a armour and like a shell of turtle. How and what kind of tools do I take for. This is so questionable point.
Tool 1_A Guldieff work as making my own income which I did as you did, still we do.
Tool 2_Hold gratitude in my heart.
Tool 3_See a reality and shut off illusions. Repel evil magnetism of mine to protect my heart to do not take any hatred to any evil,just stay with NO intervention.
urarara~~~however if I use wrong tool, it can be fool ~~~so,get right fixing point and right tool to fix up, for recovering
*9 is my Katana / Sword to cut off my foolishness,folly possibly ruin my life and health. 9 also belongs to 10. Amaterasu Ohomikami_◎_ 9 guard my innate Kami 10.
I see. Ise-Hakusan Dou written it. *666 is also Miroku.
By my view, then 999 stand up at front or behind of 666 :How they are in my head universe is,they come into a big ◯;looks like a picture of Yin Yang for my world.
That is it! Miroku means,the process to birth a well balanced new Earth! It will come! after 999 had standing up,join with 666 and got into well balanced Yin Yang as well harmonised.
...Wait minute,999 as 3 x 9 =27=2+7=9.
Its 9 rank`s Kami,Kunitokotachi Ookami is had has been always standing up... So,666 as mankind number has the each one of innate Kami/Core 999 in a middle of 666....Other wise, 666 is in a core of 999 such as Father 9 has Spiritual Penis Linga. At same stage, 666 is 999`s seeds as sperms.A essence to create His off springs. I feel good about this.
.................Urara~~~Dancing brain...
It is a fun. Just like a our life. 6`s rank soul as sun of 9 have to stand up. That is it! No ask or beg to 999. It means, 666mankind do not need to ask or beg to any God. Just do own best to stand up. 9 Kami loves to see it.
I as a mankind Turtle 6 as a one soul will respect 9 because 9 can be my inner Golden ball or the sword in my soul and heart. Well...I may have them already. Yes I have. 9`s Nature were planted in me by Root origin Kami as Spring of all beings before I came down to Earth. Supremacy to govern me or others...,OK, I might have its 9, because I see my self sometimes whip me whom had mistake and kick my buttock to fix its mistake...Oh well who knows how really its 9 works in me or not. Me neither. I just feel this as a next aslo.
This is my task :
How I grow 999 in me as the human 666, how water to them , how take Sun light in them, how I take a fresh air for them. 999 can be breathing or not is important, I feel so. I love to say this my feeling... My heart wave of gratitude will grow my inner King as Kami 999. A wave =A magnetism of keeping own originality would be best for both.
___________________
All right then, just keep going to have a healthy food,avoid to eat beef and pork for the new century comes after 2/11 2012 because that day 2/11 is a special for Japan.
A Memorial Day of Country Rise. I feel for this origin is Rising 999 of Japan`s Origin Father 国常立大神 Kunitokotachi Oomikami
Japan island is Him self. He is The Dragon It self which will has the shape changing to be Kami Bird. When?... I love to know it too.
Japan island is Him self. He is The Dragon It self which will has the shape changing to be Kami Bird. When?... I love to know it too.
How about concern my self to be a bird.
To be a bird, it is same as to be a super mankind as the half of spirit and a half of body. For to be 50% , 50% ;Yes, surely I drink a good water, Distiller.
( I hope some super rich people donates lot gallons water to countries where have a no water, less water....... )
Then work with my goodness even I feel pain for my past, also I can nurse me in a past. How?...it is a giving love to me in a past and say anything good to be healed in my heart just like we do to others,to animals,plants. Not so difficult to do from a heart even just feel love or compassion,works well to be healed. Don`t take a drug to run away from a pain came from a past on a Memory Boat.
Now enjoy the article of Taijitu.
Yin Yang as 6 and 9 shape in ◯.
....by wikipedeia. And one more thing.
As you see at next :
Taijitu can be Tai-jyutu and many of some possibility is Tai can be 太意or太医or太位 in Japanese. 太=Ta is Sun. 術=Jyutu is Art.
*Many know about Ninjya ;忍者
Ninjya is the master of Nin-Jyutu ; 忍術
Thank for letting Earth as Spirit Body live
Thank for letting Kunitokotachi Ookami live
_By 満太里_* Black rich blessed soil is best to grow seeds 666 is sure, at least on Earth.
___________________________________
Taijitu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the visual design element appearing in both Chinese and European history. For the symbolic meaning of the "supreme ultimate diagrams" in earlier Chinese philosophy and Taoism, see Wuji (philosophy) and Yin Yang. For the "supreme ultimate" or "primordial universe" in later Neo-Confucianist cosmology, see Taiji (philosophy).
Taijitu (Traditional Chinese: 太極圖; Simplified Chinese: 太极图; Wade-Giles: T'ai Chi T'u; Pinyin: tàijítú; Rough English translation: “diagram of ultimate power”) is a term which refers to a Chinesesymbol for the concept of yin and yang (Taiji). It is the universal symbol of the religion known asTaoism and is also often used by non-Taoists to represent the concept of opposites existing in harmony. The taijitu consists of a symmetrical pattern inside a circle. One common pattern has an S-shaped line that divides the circle into two equal parts of different colors. The pattern may have one or more large dots. The classic Taoist taijitu (pictured right), for example, is black and white with a black dot upon the white background, and a white dot upon the black background.
Patterns similar to the taijitu also form part of Celtic, Etruscan and Roman iconography, where they are loosely referred to as yin yang symbol by modern scholars;[1][2][3] however no relationship between these and the Chinese symbol has been established.
Contents[hide] |
[edit]Geometric figure
The taijitu is a simple geometric figure, consisting of variations of nested circles. The classical Taoist symbol can be drawn with the help of a compass and straightedge: one draws on the diameter of a circle two non-overlapping circles each of which has a diameter equal to the radius of the outer circle. One keeps the line that forms an "S," and one erases or obscures the other line.[4] Thus, one obtains a form which Taoist texts liken to a pair of fishes nestling head to tail against each other.[5] This basic pattern is not a pure product of human imagination, but also occurs − of less geometrical precision − in nature (see image at the right). In the most common Taoist variant, the two differently colored halves additionally contain one dot each of opposite color.[5]
[edit]Taoist symbolism
The term taijitu (literally "diagram of the supreme ultimate") is, in modern times, commonly used to mean the simple ‘divided circle’ form (), but it may refer to any of several schematic diagrams that contain at least one circle with an inner pattern of symmetry representing yin and yang — for example, the one at right, which was Zhou Dunyi's (1017–1073) original form of the diagram[6]. It was later popularized further in China byMing period author Lai Zhide (1525–1604).
In the taijitu, the circle itself represents a whole (see wuji), while the black and white areas within it represent interacting parts or manifestations of the whole. The white area represents yang elements, and is generally depicted as rising on the left, while the dark (yin) area is shown descending on the right (though other arrangements exist, most notably the version used on the flag of South Korea). The image is designed to give the appearance of movement. Each area also contains a large dot of a differing color at its fullest point (near the zenith and nadir of the figure) to indicate how each will transform into the other.
The Taijitu symbol is an important symbol in martial arts, particularly t'ai chi ch'uan (Taijiquan),[7] and Jeet Kune Do. In this context, it is generally used to represent the interplay between hard and soft techniques.
[edit]Taijitu shuo
The Song Dynasty philosopher Zhou Dunyi (1017–1073) wrote the Taijitu shuo 太極圖說"Explanation of the Diagram of the Supreme Ultimate", which became the cornerstone of Neo-Confucianist cosmology. His brief text synthesized aspects of Chinese Buddhism and Taoism with metaphysical discussions in the Yijing.
Zhou's key terms Wuji and Taiji appear in the opening line 無極而太極, which Adler notes could also be translated "The Supreme Polarity that is Non-Polar".
Non-polar (wuji) and yet Supreme Polarity (taiji)! The Supreme Polarity in activity generates yang; yet at the limit of activity it is still. In stillness it generates yin; yet at the limit of stillness it is also active. Activity and stillness alternate; each is the basis of the other. In distinguishing yin and yang, the Two Modes are thereby established. The alternation and combination of yang and yin generate water, fire, wood, metal, and earth. With these five [phases of] qi harmoniously arranged, the Four Seasons proceed through them. The Five Phases are simplyyin and yang; yin and yang are simply the Supreme Polarity; the Supreme Polarity is fundamentally Non-polar. [Yet] in the generation of the Five Phases, each one has its nature.[8]
Instead of usual Taiji translations "Supreme Ultimate" or "Supreme Pole", Adler uses "Supreme Polarity" (see Robinet 1990) because Zhu Xi describes it as the alternating principle of yin andyang, and ...
insists that taiji is not a thing (hence "Supreme Pole" will not do). Thus, for both Zhou and Zhu, taiji is the yin-yang principle of bipolarity, which is the most fundamental ordering principle, the cosmic "first principle." Wuji as "non-polar" follows from this.
[edit]European iconography
[edit]Celts
In Celtic art, the motif of two interlocking commas that appear to swirl is a recurrent one which can be traced back to the late 5th century BC.[9]With a view to the much later Chinese symbol, art historians of the La Tène culture refer anachronistically to these clinging pairs as "yin yang".[1]
Early Celtic yin yangs are typically not treated for themselves alone, but appear as part of larger floral or animal ornament, such as revolving leaves at the bottom of a palmette or stylized tails of seahorses.[9] In the 3rd century BC, a more geometrical style develops in which the yin yang now figures as a principal ornamental motif.[9] It is not clear whether the Celts attributed any symbolic value to the emblem, but in those cases where it is placed prominently, such as on the upper end of a scabbard, its use seems to have been apotropaic.[10]
Unlike the classic Taoist symbol, the Celtic yin yang whorls consistently lack the element of mutual penetration, and the two halves are not always portrayed in different colors.[11] In keeping with the dynamic nature of Celtic decor which is characterized by a strong predilection for curvilinear lines, the circles often leave an opening, conveying the impression of the interlocked leaves swirling endlessly around their own axis.[10]Sometimes the yin yang motif is also executed in relief.[10]
The popularity of the design with the Celts is attested by the wide range of artifacts adorned with yin yang roundels. These include beaked flagons, helmets, vases, bowls, collars, hand-pins, cross-slabs, brooches and knife blades.[12]While Celtic iconography was gradually replaced by Roman art on the continent, its revival inpost-Roman Britain and persistence in Ireland (see Insular art) also saw the resurgence of the ancient yin yang motif; the comma-shaped whorls in a triskele layout in the famous 7th centuryBook of Durrow (folio 3v) are a case in point.[13]
[edit]Etruscans
In Etruscan art, the yin yang motif arrives at the end of the 4th century BC, possibly due to the rising Celtic trans-alpine influence.[2] It appears in large size on the belly of two oenochoeexcavated in a Falisci tomb, showing a fusion of Etruscan floral ornament with the geometrical pattern by now typical of the Celtic yin yang.[2]
[edit]Romans
A mosaic in a Roman villa in Sousse, Tunisia, features differently colored halves separated by an S-shaped line, but still omits the dots.[11]
The classical yin yang pattern appears, for the first time,[3] in theRoman Notitia Dignitatum, an ancient collection of shieldpatterns of the Roman army.[14] The shield collection which dates to ca. AD 430 has survived in three manuscriptcopies.[15][16][17] These show the emblem of an infantry unit called the armigeri defensores seniores ("shield-bearers") to be graphically identical in all but color to the classic Taoist taijitu.[18] Another Western Roman detachment, thePseudocomitatenses Mauri Osismiaci, used an insignia with the same 'fish-like' form that had dots in one color.[18] An infantry regiment, the Legion palatinae Thebaei, had a pattern for its shields that also appears in taijitu: three concentric circles vertically divided into two halves of opposite and alternating colors, so that, on each side, the two colors follow one another in the inverse order of the opposite half.[18] The Roman symbols predate the taijitu by several hundred years:
As for the appearance of the iconography of the "yin-yang" in the course of time, it was recorded that in China the first representations of the yin-yang, at least the ones that have reached us, go back to the eleventh century AD, even though these two principles were spoken of in the fourth or fifth century BC. With the Notitia Dignitatum we are instead in the fourth or fifth century AD, therefore from the iconographic point of view, almost seven hundred years earlier than the date of its appearance in China.[18]
[edit]Gallery
[edit]Unicode Transformation Format Character Set
Taijitu is defined in code point U+262F (☯). As an alternative, Unicode suggested it can be substituted by U+0FCA (࿊) (Tibetan symbol nor bu nyis -khyil), the double body symbol.
[edit]See also
Similar symbols:
[edit]References
- ^ a b Peyre 1982, pp. 62−64, 82 (pl. VI);Harding 2007, pp. 68f., 70f., 76, 79, 84, 121, 155, 232, 239, 241f., 248, 253, 259;Duval 1978, p. 282; Kilbride-Jones 1980, pp. 127 (fig. 34.1), 128; Laing 1979, p. 79;Verger 1996, p. 664; Laing 1997, p. 8;Mountain 1997, p. 1282; Leeds 2002, p. 38; Morris 2003, p. 69; Megaw 2005, p. 13
- ^ a b c Peyre 1982, pp. 62−64
- ^ a b c Monastra 2000; Nickel 1991, p. 146, fn. 5; White & Van Deusen 1995, pp. 12, 32; Robinet 2008, p. 934
- ^ Peyre 1982, pp. 62f.
- ^ a b Robinet 2008, p. 934
- ^ Xinzhong Yao (13 February 2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 98–. ISBN 978-0-521-64430-3. Retrieved 29 October 2011.
- ^ Davis, Barbara (2004). Taijiquan Classics. Berkeley, California: North Atlantic Books. p. 212. ISBN 978-1-55643-431-0.
- ^ Adler, Joseph A. (1999). "Zhou Dunyi: The Metaphysics and Practice of Sagehood", in Sources of Chinese Tradition, William Theodore De Bary and Irene Bloom, eds. 2nd ed., 2 vols. Columbia University Press. pp. 673-674.
- ^ a b c Peyre 1982, pp. 62−64, 82 (pl. VI)
- ^ a b c Duval 1978, p. 282
- ^ a b Duval 1978, p. 282; Monastra 2000
- ^ Harding 2007, pp. 70f., 76, 79, 155, 232, 241f., 248, 259; Kilbride-Jones 1980, p. 128
- ^ Harding 2007, p. 253
- ^ Altheim 1951, p. 82; Fink & Ahrens 1984, p. 104; Benoist 1998, p. 116; Sacco 2003, p. 18
- ^ a b Bodleian library: Late Roman Shield Patterns. Notitia Dignitatum: Magister Peditum
- ^ Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 10291 (I): Mauri Osismiaci; Armigeri;Thebei
- ^ Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 10291 (II): Mauri Osismiaci; Armigeri;Thebei
- ^ a b c d e Monastra 2000
[edit]Sources
Taoist symbolism
- Robinet, Isabelle (2008), "Taiji tu. Diagram of the Great Ultimate", in Pregadio, Fabrizio, The Encyclopedia of Taoism A−Z, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 934−936, ISBN 978-0-7007-1200-7
European iconography
- Altheim, Franz (1951), Attila und die Hunnen, Baden-Baden: Verlag für Kunst und Wissenschaft
- Benoist, Alain de (1998), Communisme et nazisme: 25 réflexions sur le totalitarisme au XXe siècle, 1917-1989, ISBN 2-86980-028-2
- Duval, Paul-Marie (1978), Die Kelten, München: C. H. Beck, ISBN 3-406-03025-4
- Fink, Josef; Ahrens, Dieter (1984), "Thiasos ton mouson. Studien zu Antike und Christentum", Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 20, ISBN 3-412-05083-0
- Harding, D. W. (2007), The Archaeology of Celtic Art, Routledge, ISBN 0-203-69853-3
- Kilbride-Jones, H. E. (1980), Celtic Craftsmanship in Bronze, Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0-7099-0387-1
- Laing, Lloyd (1979), Celtic Britain, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, ISBN 0-7100-0131-2
- Laing, Lloyd (1997), Later Celtic Art in Britain and Ireland, Shire Publications LTD, ISBN 0-85263-874-4
- Leeds, E. Thurlow (2002), Celtic Ornament in the British Isles, E. T. Leeds, ISBN 0-486-42085-X
- Megaw, Ruth and Vicent (2005), Early Celtic Art in Britain and Ireland, Shire Publications LTD, ISBN 0-7478-0613-6
- Monastra, Giovanni (2000), "The "Yin-Yang" among the Insignia of the Roman Empire?",Sophia 6 (2)
- Morris, John Meirion (2003), The Celtic Vision, Ylolfa, ISBN 0-86243-635-4
- Mountain, Harry (1997), The Celtic Encyclopedia, 5, ISBN 1-58112-894-0
- Nickel, Helmut (1991), "The Dragon and the Pearl", Metropolitan Museum Journal 26: 139–146
- Peyre, Christian (1982), "Y a-t’il un contexte italique au style de Waldalgesheim?", in Duval, Paul-Marie; Kruta, Venceslas, L’art celtique de la période d’expansion, IVe et IIIe siècles avant notre ère, Hautes études du monde gréco-romain, 13, Paris: Librairie Droz, pp. 51–82 (62–64, 82), ISBN 978-2-600-03342-8
- Sacco, Leonardo (2003), "Aspetti 'storico-religiosi' del Taoismo (parte seconda)", Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni (Università di Roma, Scuola di studi storico-religiosi) 27 (1-2)
- Verger, Stéphane (1996), "Une tombe à char oubliée dans l'ancienne collection Poinchy de Richebourg", Mélanges de l'école française de Rome 108 (2): 641–691
- White, Lynn; Van Deusen, Nancy Elizabeth (1995), The Medieval West Meets the Rest of the World, Claremont Cultural Studies, 62, Institute of Mediaeval Music, ISBN 0-931902-94-0
No comments:
Post a Comment